Directory of United States District Court Process Servers Who Serve Defendants and Respondents

Listed below are our featured nationwide process service companies. These unique and dependable service providers are equipped to handle your U.S.D.C. process service requests anywhere in America. To get started, click on any one or all listed process service companies and get information and quotes within minutes.

If you prefer to speak with local process servers, please scroll down to where you can find process servers by state, county, and city.


Sunshine Process Services

Sandra Sunshine

Process Server

Arnie's Process Serving and Court Services

Arnold Pasternack

Process Server

Christiansen Services

Robert Christiansen

Process Server

Metro Process

Artie Scott

Process Server



See the list of Process Servers Who Serve U.S.D.C. Summons and Complaints organized by state below.




Expert Service of Process Involving Serving Defendants with a U.S.D.C. Summons and Complaint

Listed Process Servers Serve Defendants U.S.D.C. Summonses in all Federal Jurisdictions

In a United States District Court civil lawsuit, a defendant (or a respondent) is also the accused party, although not of an offense, but of a civil wrong (a tort or a breach of contract, for instance). The person who starts the civil action through filing a complaint is referred to as the plaintiff.

Listed Process Servers serve legal summons and complaint packets to Defendants in civil actions usually make their first court appearance voluntarily in response to a summons. Historically, civil defendants could be taken into custody under a writ of Caspian ad respondent. Modern day civil defendants are usually able to avoid most (if not all) court appearances if represented by a lawyer.

Most often and familiarly, defendants are persons: either natural persons (actual human beings) or juridical persons (persona fiction) under the legal fiction of treating organizations as persons.

But a defendant may be an object, in which case the object itself is the direct subject of the action. When a court has jurisdiction over an object, it is said to have jurisdiction in rem. An example of an in rem case is United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola (1916), where the defendant was not The Coca-Cola Company itself, but rather "Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola". In current US legal practice, in rem suits are primarily asset forfeiture cases, based on drug laws, as in USA v. $124,700 (2006).

Defendants can set up an account to pay for litigation costs and legal expenses. These legal defense funds can have large membership counts where members contribute to the fund. The fund can be public or private and is set up for individuals, organizations, or a particular purpose. These funds are often used by public officials, civil rights organizations, and public interest organizations.